Several points in the Guardian article (Why Kelman's Rage at the Genrefication of Scottish Literature Concerns Us All) should resonate with Malaysian writers, editors and publishers.
I nearly snorted when I came to the bit that goes: "While we may express private reservations about the work of another writer, we don't scupper their chances by saying this publicly."
Well, I know at least one highly-respected book reviewer who says one thing in private and another in public. Personally, I don't like the practice. I don't see how being "kind" about mediocre work helps raise the standard of writing and publishing in Malaysia. I understand that it hurts to have your stories torn apart by critics, but if you want to be a writer, criticism is something you have to expect and get used to.
I'm all for (as a reviewer, editor and publisher) giving one's honest opinion, offering constructive criticism, and (as a writer) taking it on the chin and learning from it.
(One doesn't become a reviewer, editor or publisher to make friends. Join a knitting circle for that.)
Hello Book Chook - Thanks for your comment. In a country like Malaysia, with a very young publishing industry, I just don't think writers are being done a favours when they're not reviewed honestly - and they're not doing themselves any favours by refusing to listen to constructive criticism. I do agree though that it is difficult to be honest especially when you're likely to meet the author you're reviewing at the next book event! :-)
Posted by: Daphne | Monday, September 07, 2009 at 13:53
I just dropped by to say how much I agree with your recent article in The Star Online (Where’s the fun gone? TOTS TO TEENS) It's the same in Australia, we're we so focused on quantifying reading there doesn't seem to be room for loving it anymore.
As a book reviewer, I admit to being unwilling to tear writers to shreds. That's why I screen books before I accept them.
Posted by: The Book Chook | Monday, September 07, 2009 at 13:48