![]()
Untamed … Where the Wild Things Are
What would it be like if Edmund, Lucy, Peter and Susan Pevensie could escape from wartorn Britain through the back of a wardrobe – only to be totally cool and blank about this new world of fawns and talking lions? Or if Dorothy and Toto could fly away from drab family strife to a multi-coloured land of midgets and witches and yellow brick roads and yet remain shruggingly laidback about the evident contrast between this place and Kansas? My guess is that it would look like this film, Spike Jonze's subdued, deadpan and even slightly depressive account of Maurice Sendak's much-loved 1963 picturebook classic Where the Wild Things Are.
- Where the Wild Things Are
- Production year: 2009
- Country: USA
- Cert (UK): PG
- Runtime: 60 mins
- Directors: Spike Jonze
- Cast: Catherine Keener, Catherine O'Hara, Forest Whitaker, James Gandolfini, Lauren Ambrose, Max Records, Paul Dano
It has been expanded into a full-length psychological study of childhood loneliness and dysfunction, in which an unruly boy called Max (tousle-haired, 12-year-old Max Roberts) explodes with unhappiness and rage at the frustrations at home, and runs off. He sails to a remote land occupied by vast Muppety creatures: gloomy, clumsy, quarrelsome beasts, who after some discord accept him as their king. Instead of screaming with horror and astonishment at these extraordinary talking animal-giants, or in any normal way freaking out, Max calmly takes them at face value. They are, perhaps, hardly less scary than the grownups and bigger kids who intimidate him all the time. In this way, Jonze's movie intuits both the unjudging nature of a child and also an adult's detached understanding that, being metaphorical, these beasts are nothing to be scared of.
Metaphors for what, though? The movie begins with a plausible sketch of an imaginative, lonely boy who feels neglected. He plays on his own – a much older sister hangs out with her much older friends, one of whom may be her boyfriend, another unconquerable gulf between them. His mom (Catherine Keener) is affectionate enough, but clearly distracted by her job, some sort of freelance writing work that isn't going very well. Then there is Max's dad, played by Mark Ruffalo – but is this, in fact, his dad? Is he a stepfather or mom's boyfriend? At all events, he is a pretty distant and unsatisfactory dad figure with whom Max has no obvious connection. When he has a tantrum with his mother, and actually bites her, all this guy very feebly says is: "He can't treat you like that …"
On a crisp snowy day, friendless Max has built himself a heartbreaking igloo-cocoon. Seeing his sister show up at the house with her cool friends, he prepares a snowball-ambush, and we tense, expecting an upsetting putdown. But no; they join in gamely enough. The crisis comes when these big teenagers play too rough, hurting and upsetting little Max, and accidentally destroying his small igloo. Unable and unwilling to offer the tearful boy the necessary hugs of comfort, they just slouch off with embarrassed giggles, lighting the fuse for his later tantrum-explosion and traumatised escape.
His new land itself has a weirdness that isn't immediately obvious. It is partly woodland, partly rocky headland, leading to a windswept deserted beach bombarded with rolling, dangerous-looking breakers. Yet this stiff wind dies to nothing when Max traipses with one of the creatures through a limitless, whispering desert. It would surely be impossible to draw a map of this country, à la Tolkien or CS Lewis. Often it is seen bathed in a glowing sunset light, which adds a further level of unreality and disorientation.
These monsters are reasonably keen to accept Max as their king, perhaps as a way of solving their internal grumbling differences, and agree to Max's plan to build a big hideaway structure where they can all live and sleep together in a huddle. But it is clear that his reign, if that is what it is, is doomed. Max seems at odds with the female presence among the wild things, and there is a boys v girls division in this brave new world that echoes his life at home, overshadowed by female authority figures.
It grew on me. Dave Eggers is its co-writer, and his kidult literary aesthetic is an acquired taste. Yet I made one or two more steps here towards fanhood. Between them, Jonze and Eggers have created an intriguing oddity whose fate it may be to fall between the sensibilities of adults and children. Mike Myers took Dr Seuss's The Cat in the Hat and turned it into a crass and misjudged romp. Wes Anderson took Roald Dahl's Fantastic Mr Fox and reinvented it in his own school of cool – and yet he preserved and extended the original's innocent charm. Jonze's Wild Things is an altogether darker, colder picture: a film about the way children can lose their fear of the world only by losing their innocence. Jonze's design extrapolates the book very cleverly, but I have a feeling that loyal fans and family audiences looking for fun may be disconcerted. It certainly doesn't offer much Christmas jollity. Jonze's fans, on the other hand, will find that this director's talents remain untamed.
Recent Comments